Skip to main content

White-Nose Syndrome

Little Brown Bats exhibiting WNS symptoms
photo courtesy of Nancy Heaslip, New York Department of Environmental Conservation

I'm going to switch gears now and tell you about something quite serious that is devastating bat populations in the Northeastern United States and continuing to spread. It is called White-Nose Syndrome, or WNS, and since its discovery in a cave near Albany, New York in February 2006, it has wiped out an estimated 1 million bats in 9 states - with some caves experiencing a 90-100% mortality rate! - and scientists have yet to figure out the how's and the why's.

So far, it has affected 6 different bat species, all of which are insectivorous and hibernating species - the endangered Indiana myotis (Myotis sodalis), the little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus), the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), the tri-colored bat (Perimyotis subflavus), the northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis), and the eastern small-footed myotis (Myotis leibii).

To begin, let me provide a bit of background information concerning hibernation (because this appears to be when the bats are dying). During this state, the bats' body temperature and heart rate slow down dramatically (sometimes within 1 degree of the temperature of the cave!) and they live off of their previously stored body fat. If a bat is disturbed too many times during hibernation, it is likely to die because all of the fat reserves are used up, and the bat cannot go out in search of more food because it is the dead of winter, and there are no insects to be found.

Again, it is at some point in their hibernation that these bats are dying. The dead bats are found inside their hibernation caves or just outside of them. They are emaciated and have a never-before-seen white fungus on their noses, ears, and/or wings. However, it is not yet clear whether it is the fungus, named Geomyces destructans, that is killing the bats - there is no evidence that a fungus has ever killed a mammal - or if the fungus is an opportunistic invader, coming in after the bats have been weakened by something else. What can be said of the fungus is that it thrives in the same temperature range and dark, moist conditions in which the bats hibernate. It is not known how the fungus - which is genetically similar in all of the cave sites - was introduced. It is known, however, that the fungus is transmitted from place to place via fungal spores, which could be carried on the bat's fur, the clothes or shoes of humans, or through the air.

Now, I mentioned that the dead bats found are emaciated. What appears to be happening is that the bats are losing their body fat mid-winter, so that they either die before they are able to wake from their torpor, or they wake prematurely and fly outside in search for food and freeze. (The few bats that do survive the winter are found to have wing damage from frostbite and/or the fungus.)

Some scientists have hypothesized that the loss of body fat is due to an inadequate supply of polyunsaturated fats that are supplied by certain insects, which are dying off because of pesticides. (Pesticides that shouldn't need to be used in the first place because these bats act as nature's pest controllers by consuming these insects.) It has also been suggested that the bats perhaps rouse prematurely because of irritation due to the fungus, which reaches their dermis, or living part of the skin. The fungus could also have physiological effects on the delicate wing membrane which regulates body temperature and blood pressure, thus interrupting hibernation. The warm or variable winter weather is also a hypothesis as to why the bats are waking mid-winter.

Unfortunately, the money needed to fund WNS research is slow-coming. So far it has come mainly from Bat Conservation International, the National Speleological Society and other non-governmental sources. The scientific community is trying to obtain more funding from the federal government, but according to BCI's website, the Senate Appropriations Committee report "contains only $500,000 of the $11 million identified by the scientific community for immediate WNS funding."

Such a devastating loss in bat populations doesn't just mean that 1 million bats are dead. The loss of 1 million bats means that the organisms supported by the guano on the cave floor will die, the pest population that the bats are no longer consuming will increase, you will get more mosquito bites, the increased number of agricultural pests will damage more crops, the crops will be sprayed with more pesticide... And - if the pesticide/polyunsaturated fat hypothesis holds true - more bats will die. Of course, the greatest thing at stake here is the potential extinction of entire bat species.

Comments

  1. Helo Christy!
    Almost 1 year after I discover your webblog and I would like to thank you very much to direct me on the Bat Conservation organisation. I'm member now and I'll spread as much as I can the message around me.
    Thanks a lot for your webblog.
    Best Regards
    Myriam.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chiropterophily: Bat Pollination

I see you! Geoffroy's tailless bat (Anoura Geoffroyi) - photo by Nathan Muchhala Ever since coming across this word, I can't stop saying it: chiropterophily. Chiropterophily, or pollination of plants by bats, is very common in the tropics. Hundreds of tropical plant species are exclusively or at least partly pollinated by nectar-feeding bats. Many tropical flowers are night-blooming, specializing in attracting bats. Bat-flowers are typically white, cream, or pale green in color, making them easier to see in the dark. They usually have a musky, fermented odor - like that of the bat - or sometimes a fruity odor. They have a large, sturdy, open shape with long, bushy anthers so that the bat's head and chest get coated in pollen when it visits. In return for the bat pollinating the flower, the flower provides the nectar that these high-energy flying mammals need.* Tube-lipped nectar bat (Anoura fistulata) - photo by Nathan Muchhala Nectivorous bats have both good eyesight an...

Eyeshine in Nocturnal Animals

Peters' Epauletted Fruit Bat (Epomophorus crypturus), Kruger National Park - photo by Peet van Schalkwyk Have you ever noticed how under certain lighting conditions some animal's eyes seem to glow? Animals that are nocturnal hunters - and a few of them that are not - have something called eyeshine . Eyeshine is the light that we see reflected back from the animal's tapetum lucidum (a membrane behind the animal's retina). Light enters the eye, passes through the retina, strikes the reflective membrane, and is reflected back through the eye toward the light source. This phenomenon makes the most of what little light there is at night for these nocturnal creatures. a moth with pink eyeshine Humans can display the red-eye effect in flash photography, but we do not have a tapetum lucidum , and thus, do not have eyeshine. Eyeshine is best observed by wearing a head lamp or holding a flashlight at eye level against your temple because the light is reflected right back into ...

Leaving Bosque del Cabo

January 4, 2010 We woke right before dawn. The howler monkeys were especially vocal this morning (or perhaps we just slept through the loud parts the previous mornings). We got ready then had a super quick breakfast of granola and fruit. The staff packed us some sandwiches for later. I selected avocado; Nick selected the pb&j deluxe. Eric drove us to the small, regional airport in Puerto Jiménez. It was a quiet ride; we were sad to go. We were fortunate to be able to stay 6 days; but even in this amount of time, we didn't do everything we wished to, like hike down to the beaches, hike to the waterfalls and the take the zipline tour. As we continued down the road, we passed the signpost to Lapa Rios, the lodge we had stayed at the previous year. Which was better? I hate to make such comparisons, as each of these places holds a special place in our hearts. Lapa Rios was the climactic end to our very first trip to Costa Rica. It was during the rainy seaso...